Unit+4+-+Final+Report

Short description
In this unit, we should improve and finalize all our annotated bibliographies and learning objects.We should also write a reflection paper including our self-assesment. We were also requested to do the **peer assessment** developed by Sandra and Mónica.

Now that I've finished (dead line oblige!!!) I almost want to rewind ... I feel much more confident writing in English and I feel that if now it was the beginning of this UC my performances would be much better ... Anyway It's done and I'm certain that I've done my best under the circumstances. I'm very glad with the result of some of my LO, and even with some of the (last) annotated bibliographies.Time was always the big problem: it was never in off ... even now I'm not satisfied and I feel that I need more time to do what I need and want but I loved this “challenging adventure”: I’ve learned a lot and I like to learn; I improved my English and that was one of my objectives...today I know that I can do much more that I ever believed...:-) || Anyway I think that the work I've done was good (at least technically) and became better with time and learning. As I also said before, I know now that I'm in conditions to do even better because transparency made me learn with the others, I could not "enjoy" the collaborative spirit this time because I was a little bit "out of Time" and I had to d the work alone. But my colleagues were fantastic’s and several times congratulated me for my work and give me the necessary courage will to continue. I can, of course, compete with some colleagues that work with new technologies for leaving and have and deal with adults when teaching. I'm an elementary Portuguese teacher that wants to get more from life and use to say that “being born during the 60's it was not her fault so she must fight to change it". In this perspective, and because I'm here by free will and pleasure, I I think my work correspond to the demands. But without sentimentalisms I think I missed some issues that were required so I must pay for that. I wanted to maintain the level of performance that I had in the first semester, but, due the "incidents", I'll understand a 15-16 if possible.
 * [[image:refection2.jpg width="109" height="149" caption="http://zenhabits.net/fotos/20071230reflection.jpg"]] || ===Reflection=== ||  || In each page of this wiki there are the all the work developed by myself with the suggested corrections and some enrichments.
 * ||  ||   || **P.S: Some comments done "a posteriori" didn't make sense here ...so they are at [|Thera's blog] or in related discussion forum...** ||
 * || ===**Grade proposals...**=== ||  || For me it's always difficult to evaluate myself. As I said before, I’m conscientious that I did my best, but I also know that it was not in off. I agreed with all the comments Professor Paulsen did to my work and for several times I tried to find time to correct things...didn't get it...
 * || ===**Grade proposals...**=== ||  || For me it's always difficult to evaluate myself. As I said before, I’m conscientious that I did my best, but I also know that it was not in off. I agreed with all the comments Professor Paulsen did to my work and for several times I tried to find time to correct things...didn't get it...

For my colleagues I think Sandra and Monica had very good performances and participation; Paulo Simoes Group was also very good and participative. I suppose that Joaquim has the same problem that I have: time, but, as far as I could see, he has also done a good work. I suppose that all the class tried to correspond giving the best and, if I didn't know that some of them are just doing two U.C. this semester, I would say that they were extraordinary. The enthusiasm that they put on work was also a big help I think. So, in the majority the performance of the all class was, in my opinion very good.

Teresa Rafael ||